Are Short-Term Rentals Still Driving Up Housing Costs? A Closer Look at the Real Impact

Short-term rentals have become a permanent fixture in today’s housing landscape. Platforms like Airbnb and VRBO offer travelers flexibility and homeowners new income opportunities but they also continue to raise a critical question for cities and residents alike: Are short-term rentals still driving up housing costs, or has their impact been overstated?

As housing affordability remains a major concern across the U.S., understanding the true role of short-term rentals is more important than ever.

How Short-Term Rentals Change Local Housing Markets

At their core, short-term rentals convert housing from a long-term use into a temporary one. When a property that could house a full-time resident instead becomes a vacation rental, it effectively reduces the supply of available homes for locals.

In tight housing markets, even small reductions in supply can have outsized effects. Fewer long-term rental units mean increased competition among tenants, which often leads to higher rents. For buyers, limited inventory can also push home prices upward as demand continues to outpace supply.

This dynamic often referred to as the “Airbnb effect” has been widely studied, especially in urban and tourist-heavy areas.

What the Research Actually Shows

While short-term rentals do influence housing costs, most studies suggest they are not the primary driver of rising prices nationwide.

Instead, larger structural factors play a much bigger role, including:

  • Chronic underbuilding of housing

  • Population growth in major metro areas

  • Zoning and land-use restrictions

  • Rising construction and labor costs

  • Higher interest rates affecting new development

Short-term rentals tend to contribute incrementally, not overwhelmingly. In many cities, their impact on rent and home prices is measurable but relatively modest compared to these broader economic forces.

Where Short-Term Rentals Have the Greatest Impact

Although their national impact may be limited, short-term rentals can have significant local effects, especially in:

  • Tourist destinations (beach towns, ski resorts, vacation hubs)

  • Smaller cities with limited housing stock

  • Neighborhoods with a high concentration of investor-owned properties

In these markets, a noticeable share of housing may be removed from long-term availability. This can make it harder for essential workers teachers, service employees, healthcare staff to live in the communities they serve.

Seasonal markets are particularly vulnerable, as homes sit vacant for parts of the year while residents struggle to find stable housing.

The Economic Upside of Short-Term Rentals

It’s important to acknowledge that short-term rentals also bring real benefits:

  • They support tourism and local businesses

  • They generate income for homeowners, often helping cover rising mortgage and maintenance costs

  • They provide flexible lodging options beyond traditional hotels

For many property owners, short-term rentals serve as a financial lifeline, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or inflation.

The Trade-Off for Neighborhoods and Residents

Despite these benefits, communities often feel the downsides:

  • Rising rents and home prices

  • Reduced housing availability for long-term residents

  • Increased turnover and loss of neighborhood stability

  • Noise, parking, and quality-of-life concerns

As more homes become transient accommodations, some neighborhoods lose the sense of permanence that comes with full-time residents.

Why Cities Are Turning to Regulation

Because the effects of short-term rentals vary widely by location, many cities are opting for targeted regulation rather than outright bans. Common approaches include:

  • Limiting short-term rentals to primary residences

  • Capping the number of rental days per year

  • Requiring registration, permits, or local taxes

  • Enforcing zoning rules more strictly

These policies aim to strike a balance allowing homeowners to earn income while protecting long-term housing supply.

So, Are Short-Term Rentals Still to Blame?

The answer is nuanced.

Short-term rentals are not the sole cause of rising housing costs, but they can worsen affordability challenges in already tight markets. Their impact is highly localized, meaning policy solutions must be tailored to individual communities rather than applied universally.

As housing shortages persist, addressing affordability will ultimately require broader solutions such as increasing housing supply, reforming zoning laws, and encouraging responsible development alongside thoughtful regulation of short-term rentals.

Final Thoughts

Short-term rentals are neither villains nor saviors of the housing market. They are one piece of a much larger puzzle. Understanding their real impact helps policymakers, property owners, and residents make more informed decisions about how to balance economic opportunity with housing stability.

Source: Are Short-Term Rentals Still Driving Up Housing Costs? – Home Stratosphere
https://www.newsbreak.com/home-stratosphere-314909776/3995254517836-are-short-term-rentals-still-driving-up-housing-costs